Saturday, 3 October 2015

Update: Heavy security at Abuja blasts scene


Security men are keeping watch at the scene of Friday night bomb blast in Nyanya in Abuja.


The Inspector General of Police, Solomon Arase arrived the scene about 11.25am to inspect the damage caused by the twin bomb blast.


An eyewitness said he counted 10 to 15 bodies burnt beyond recognition in the blasts which reportedly occurred within space of five minutes.


 


First bomb blast occurred at the Jikwoyi park at 9.20pm and second blast at 9.25pm


 


Some residents who said they were amongst the first respondents at the scene however said the death toll may not be as high as reported.





Source link



Two suicide bombers responsible for Abuja blasts – Police


Following the bomb blast that occurred in Kuje and Nyanya areas in Abuja, the Inspector-General of Police, Solomon Arase has ordered a stop-and-search operation in and around Abuja.


The Police chief also directed the immediate deployment of Police Explosives Ordinance Disposal Units (PEODU) to the scenes to prevent further damage.


The directive was contained in a statement on Saturday by the Force Spokesperson, ACP Olabisi Kolawole.


The statement indicated that the blasts were carried out by two suicide bombers; a male and a female.


According to the statement, the IGP stated that the perpetrators of the act did so in shame of cowardice, adding that no matter their aim, Nigeria will not accommodate terrorists’ acts.


He however urged Nigerians to be vigilant at all times and report any suspicious persons or objects to the nearest Police Station or any other security agencies for prompt intervention.


The IGP was also at the scene of the blast to ascertain the degree of the blast.





Source link



FCT Perm Sec, Police boss condemn Abuja bomb blasts


The Federal Capital Territory  Permanent Secretary, Engr. John Chukwu, has condemned the twin suicide bomb blasts in Kuje, a suburb of Abuja late Friday.


Chukwu  commiserated with people of Kuje Satellite Town, particularly those who lost their loved ones in the incident.


While also commiserating with the injured persons, the Permanent Secretary described the wanton destruction of lives and property as heartless and an act of wickedness on soft targets, which has “no place in our history and tradition”.


According to the statement issued by the Deputy Director/Chief Press Secretary, Muhammad Sule, the Permanent Secretary assured that the FCT Administration would continue to work closely with the security agencies to ensure the safety of lives and property of all the residents of the Federal Capital Territory.


Chukwu prayed for the speedy recovery of the injured persons.


He has however appealed to the residents of the Federal Capital Territory to be more vigilant and report any suspicious person or movement to the law enforcement agents.


The FCT Police Commissioner, Mr. Wilson Inalegwu, also condemned the unfortunate act.





Source link



Friday, 2 October 2015

Bayelsa election: PDP, Sylva in war of words


  • Sylva not electable —Party

  • APC candidate: Dickson will soon be history

The Bayelsa State chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Campaign Organisation of Timipre Sylva yesterday attacked each other verbally over the candidacy of the All Progressive Congress (APC) for the December 5 governorship election.


Former Governor Timipre Sylva, who emerged the APC candidate, will slug it out with the sole candidate of the PDP and incumbent state governor, Seriake Dickson.


But the PDP said Sylva is not electable.


The State Secretary of the PDP, Keku Godspower in a statement in Yenagoa yesterday, said the emergence of Sylva was a shame and insult to the collective sensibilities of Bayelsans and APC members.


Keku said APC’s decision was an indication that it was not prepared for any serious outing at the election because “everybody in Bayelsa knows that Sylva is not electable.”


He, however, claimed that since Sylva’s emergence, there was palpable fear, tension and apprehension among Bayelsans following the violence that marred the recent APC primary in the state.


Keku also alleged that Sylva had a record of violence and that his second coming would not be different.


He alleged that since the primary, the state had witnessed the influx of cultists and militants.


He added that the development, if not checked, could lead to a relapse of violence in the state and the entire Niger Delta region.


Keku, however, said he was confident that possible violence would be contained by security agencies, assuring the people that the state would deal with anyone caught breaching the peace or molesting anyone.


He advised Bayelsans to go about their lawful businesses without fear of intimidation, urging them to report any suspicious character to the security agencies.


He asked the people to vote for PDP and also called on the Federal Government to direct its security agencies to take urgent steps to ensure the security of lives and property in the state.


“With the December 5 governorship election around the corner, we duly call on the people to reject Sylva’s candidacy outright and his APC-led politics of violence and intimidation which has become a well- known trademark,” he stated.


But Sylva’s campaign organisation, in a statement signed by Doifie Buokoribo, said the PDP was jittery because its candidate, Dickson, would soon become history.


He said: “We know the PDP game plan was to prevent the emergence of a strong and popular APC governorship candidate so that they can easily repeat their trademark shenanigan of aborting democratic competition and stealing victory without a contest.


“With that deception, they stole the mandate of the people in 2011, when both Chief Timipre Sylva and Mr. Ndutimi Alaibe were dubiously excluded just to give Hon. Henry Dickson victory without a real electoral contest.


“All the frenzied disparagement of Sylva now by PDP is an understandable manifestation of fear and frustration over their impending, indubitable defeat at the December 5 election.


“That frenzy is understandable. We will make Dickson history.”





Source link



Court fixes November 6 for arraignment of IPMAN factional president …as judge’s absence stalls trial


Federal High Court, Jabi, Federal Capital Territory (FCT), yesterday adjourned the arraignment of the alleged factional President of the Independent Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), Mr. Lawson Obasi, till November 9.


Speaking with journalists in Abuja, counsel to the Elder Chinedu Okoronkwo-led IPMAN, Barrister Nnamna Oru, said the adjournment was due to the absence of the presiding judge who is engaged at the election tribunal in Gombe State.


The counsel to the complainant recalled that “on the 6th of July, the suspect was to be arraigned here but the court couldn’t sit on the account of the absence of the presiding judge, who is engaged in the tribunals in Gombe State. So, because of the state and urgency of the matters at the tribunal, he is still sitting and the court couldn’t sit today.


“So the matter was adjourned to the 9th of November, by which period he would have been through with his tribunal engagement and appropriate steps taken to prosecute the matter.


“I am watching view for the nominal complainant of this matter. The complainant is the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), led by the National President, Elder Chinedu Okoronkwo.”


The court had fixed yesterday for the arraignment of Obasi and three others who were dragged before it over criminal allegations.


Others charged alongside Obasi are Ukadike Chinedu, Augustine Erhabor and Andrew Ashiga.


The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Mohammed Diri, who was present in court on September 6, had filed the six-count charge before the FCT High Court.


Count one of the 6-count charge filed by Diri on behalf of the Federal Government, among others, reads: “That you, Chief Lawson Obasi, Ukadike Chinedu (aka Asha), Augustine Erhabor and Andrew Ashiga (now at large) on or about the 14th day of April 2014, within the judicial division of the High Court of FCT, conspired to commit an offence, in that while you armed yourselves with dangerous weapons such as cutlasses, wood, iron rod and knives, you violently forced yourselves into the premises of Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) headquarters located at No. 41, Gnassigbe Eyadema Street, Asokoro, Abuja and attacked the headquarters by breaking the doors, windows, lockers and cardboards of the office and inflicting various degrees of injuries on the occupants and robbed them of large sums of money and valuable properties valued at millions of naira.”


The FG stated that in pursuance of their conspiracy, the accused persons “thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 6(b) of the Robbery and Firearms (Special Provisions) Act 2004.





Source link



Joy, apprehension greet payment of police officers’ gratuities after 10-year wait


After being denied their gratuities and pensions for 10 years, some distraught police retirees heaved a sigh of relief when they were paid barely one month after their pathetic story was published by The Nation. KUNLE AKINRINADE captures the mixed bag of joy and apprehension among the


FOR about one decade after they retired from the Nigeria Police Force, they waited in vain for their gratuities and pensions. Some of them had died in the process, while the surviving ones wallowed in misery and penury. But reprieve came the ways of some of the officers after their pathetic stories were published by The Nation on Saturday, August 15, 2015.


Penultimate week, the affected officers took turns to speak with our correspondent on the telephone after receiving parts of their retirement benefits and pension from the Pension Transitional Arrangement Directorate (PTAD).


The story titled, A Decade Without a Dime, had highlighted the plight of police retirees Ekanem Uwem (ASP); Alhaji Abiodun Sanni (ASP); Essien Aniefiok James (DSP); Wahab Ishola (ASP); Sergeant Kamoru Bakare; Halimat Bamidele and Idris Mohammed, widow and son of the late Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) and Sanni Fakayode Bamidele(ASP) and Idris Akeju Muhammed(DSP) respectively.


The aggrieved ex-policemen, who were among about 1,000 officers with similar fate, had written several letters to the Police Pension Office, the Human Rights Commission and the National Assembly but their efforts yielded no fruit. They had also participated in a nationwide verification exercise conducted by PTAD last year but nothing came out of it.


Contacted on the plight of the officers, the immediate past Force Public Relations Officer, Mr Emmanuel Ojukwu, had told The Nation that their issue would be looked into. Ojukwu asked them to forward a letter stating their case to his office, promising prompt action. Interestingly, the aggrieved officers said they could not contact the former police spokesperson before he was moved from the office a few days later.


Uwem said: “We did not contact Ojukwu before he was removed as the spokesperson of Nigeria Police Force. It was shocking that we received notifications of payment of our gratuity and pension a few days later.


“I was surprised to receive an alert from my bank concerning the payment of my gratuity on Wednesday September 9, 2015, while two months pension arrears were also paid two days later. In all, I was paid N1.4 million as gratuity, and N72, 000 as pension for the months of June and July, 2015. The payment came rather late, but I thank God for using your newspaper to publish our plight and the penury which non-payment of our benefits had sentenced us into.


“It was so sad that we had to wait for 10 years to access our pension and gratuity. We deserved to be fairly treated for ensuring the security of lives and property of people during our service years. Instead, we were denied our benefits for no tangible reason, until our story was published.”


Speaking from his base in Akwa Ibom State, one of Uwem’s colleagues, Aniefiok, told our correspondent that he too was shocked to receive his entitlements without any prior notice. The beleaguered retired Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), who had to work as backstreet photographer cum videographer to make ends meet, said: “I was shocked too when my bank sent me notifications about the payment of my gratuity and pension for the months of June and July, 2015. It came just after our story was published in The Nation.


“Although the money is small considering my long years in service, but at all at all na im bad (half a loaf is better than none). At least there is something for us after many years of hopelessness occasioned by non- payment of our benefits.”


Alhaji Sanni, one of the retirees who is currently putting up with one of his children, also said he was shocked to receive his gratuity and pension for June and July, 2015. He expressed gratitude that the money was eventually paid after a long wait. He, however, gave knocks to the pension authorities for short-paying him. According to him, the sum of N1.6 million paid into his account by PTAD was a far cry from his entitlements for the 35 years he spent in service.


On his part, Ishola, 67, said: “I have just been paid. I thank your media organisation for taking up our case. We thought that our sweat for this nation had gone in vain and that we would never be paid our entitlements again until I received credit alert from my bank that my gratuity and two months pension arrears had been paid.”


However, Sergeant Bakare and relatives of the two deceased officers, Bamidele and Mohammed, said they had not been paid at press time. Our findings revealed that they might have been captured under the contributory pension scheme which came into force a few years ago.


A highly placed source at the pension agency, who craved anonymity because he was not permitted to speak in official capacity, explained that “the report on the plight of the officers was very embarrassing to the agency (PTAD), hence, action was expedited to ensure that they were paid their entitlements a few days after the story was published.


“As for those who are left out of the lot, they must have been included in the contributory pension scheme and they would have to wait a while to access their entitlements. The Police Pension Department under PTAD is saddled with the payment of gratuity and pension of police pensioners who retired on or before June 30, 2007, while the National Pension Commission (PENCOM) takes care of the payment of entitlements of retired policemen in the new contributory pension initiative through Pension Fund Administrators.”


New lease of life


The affected officers also disclosed that they would invest their money in profitable ventures that would sustain their lives in retirement. Aniefiok, for instance, said he would use the money to improve his video business and empower his wife in her trade.


“I will first have to pay outstanding bills after which I would use part of the money to expand my business as well as lift my wife’s trade.


“A substantial percentage of the money will also be reserved to take care of the home front, especially the welfare of my children and their studies. For example, one of my children has just travelled back to Egypt and I was able to assist him with some money for his trip.”


For Uwem, who before now had been trapped in Imo State where he last served, owing to lack funds, said: “I will first wait for some time to see the frequency at which subsequent monthly pension would come before considering moving back to my home town in Akwa Ibom. However, I cannot rule out the possibility of using a substantial part of the money to do business for self-sustenance.”


Alhaji Sanni, who is just recuperating from an illness that has kept him out of circulation lately, told our correspondent that he would surely channel his money into a profitable venture.


He said: “I have been down with sickness for some months now, but I am getting better at the moment. Once my health is restored, I shall consider what to do with the money. Since part of it will be used to clear my medical bill, I shall also reserve a substantial part of the money to engage myself in a business that will take care of my family. My only worry is that I don’t know how constantly our pension will be paid.


Ishola, on his part, said: “I am going to invest my money in a profitable business that can sustain me and my family. In view of the ambiguous payment, it would be a misplaced priority on my part if I don’t put part of my money in a business since I don’t know when my next pension would be paid.”


Payment deficit


While the payment might have brought temporary relief to the former officers, it leaves some posers on their minds. They expressed reservation about the correlation between the sums paid and their long years in service..


“If we are to go by our years in service, what we have been paid is nothing to write home about. My colleagues and I spent about 35 years in service to this country, but the sums we got ranged between N1.4 million and N1.6 million, without any explanation from those responsible for the payment of our after-service emoluments.


”Since many of us left service about 10 years ago, we have not been paid a dime as pension. It was thus surprising that PTAD considered us worthy of only two-month pension arrears out of the 10 years. Yet we are not sure of whether the remaining backlogs would be cleared or steadily paid,” said Sanni.


Sanni’s remark was echoed by Ishola, who figured that the payment was haphazardly done to prevent them from making further noise in the media.


He said: “I think that we were hurriedly paid to shut our mouth or prevent us from talking to journalists again. This was obvious in the payment done so far. For example, how on earth can they justify paying us less than N2 million after more than 30 years in service as policemen? How come we were paid just two months pension arrears out of 10 years without any tangible explanation?


“Many of us have been battling with accumulated bills and bad debts. Little will be left of the money by the time we defray our debts and bills. It is in the light of this that we are asking the pension authorities to review the payment and pay us what is commensurate with the 35 years we spent in service as policemen.”


The dispositions of Uwem and Aniefiok were in no way different from those of Sanni and Ishola. The duo carpeted the Pension Transitional Arrangement Directorate (PTAD) for the payment deficit.


Uwem queried: “As commendable as the payment is after a 10-year wait, the fact that it was done after our story was published in the newspaper has created a moral burden on the Nigerian pension authorities. It is disheartening that the concerned pension agency waited until our story came out in the media before paying our entitlements.


“Moreover, there is deficit in the payment considering the paltry sum that was paid. I am of the conviction that N1.4 million or N1.6 million cannot represent the total value of what we deserve as entitlements. I am also displeased that only two months pension was paid after about 10 years of being denied pension. So, where is the rest of our money?”


Responding via an email forwarded to our correspondent, the spokesman of PTAD, Mr. Ademola Ogundeyi, in one breadth, said the questions raised by the pensioners over the gratuities and pension they were paid was being looked into. He promised to revert to our correspondent once he got information from the relevant department in charge of the matter.


However, in another breadth, Ogundeyi said the agency would not respond to inquires from a third party (our correspondent).


He said: “I have passed this mail (inquires from our correspondent) to the relevant department to look into and will get back to you once I get information on the matter.


“While we appreciate your efforts in getting this situation across to us, we prefer to engage our pensioners directly, for this reason going forward, I will only respond to mail from pensioners directly and not through a third party.”


 


 





Source link



Buhari’s laconic, idiosyncratic October 1 speech


IT is unlikely that at any time in his presidency, Muhammadu Buhari will ever bore his audience. His inauguration speech was a model in terseness, with no frills, and nearly with no memorable sound bite. The speech was relieved perhaps only by the almost aphoristic “I belong to everybody, and I belong to nobody” statement he used to underscore his wistful desire for personal and political independence. His inauguration speech was supposed to be the biggest thing on the day he was sworn in, something to announce his return to power, his grand success after three failed attempts at the presidency, and something to define the new Buhari. It rose to no such peak, having of course exhibited no ambition to soar either at the rhetorical or tactical level. Indeed, the speech was absolutely idiosyncratic. It gave Nigeria the essential Buhari, the one forgotten from 1985, the one that has in fact changed little since then.


President Buhari has since then given a few other speeches at home and abroad. To his credit, none has been denounced as long-winded. All have been as terse as possible, ending barely moments after he started delivering them. In France, he was laconic; and in the United States, he exampled brevity. But as terse as they often were, the speeches gave no opportunity to his audience to make up their minds to like or dislike what he had to say. Someday in the future, when a verbose and tedious president will weary the country with offensive nothings, and lather them with pompous, jaded and swollen phrases, the beauty and even nobility of President Buhari’s taciturnity will be appreciated anew.


It was no surprise, however, that two days ago the president once again failed to conflate a great speech with a great and unique moment. October 1, Nigeria’s Independence Day, had been consistently belittled by past leaders, sometimes in favour of May 29, the so-called Democracy Day, but President Buhari who claims to exemplify change was expected to lead a reawakening of that irreplaceable and historic day. Alas, in his speech, he paid only lip service to the day. After acknowledging it as an anniversary the country should be proud of, he then proceeded to misconceive the spiritual and political import of the anniversary. Other than a few platitudes, and one or two florid statements, there was nothing else in the speech to qualify it as an Independence Day anniversary speech, nor anything memorable to emblematise the change he spoke fondly and glowingly of, nor yet something deep, historical and inspiring.


Really, the speech was inappropriate for the occasion. It was reassuring and thoughtful of President Buhari to acknowledge the contributions of former president Goodluck Jonathan to the peaceful succession that enthroned the All Progressives Congress (APC), a fact his first few giddy weeks in office seemed to ignore until some Christian leaders, including Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor the Christian Association of Nigeria president and Bishop Hassan Kukah, angrily reminded him. And he also spoke fervently of the country’s natural endowments as springboard for Nigeria’s economic development. Then he applauded the country’s staying power, remarked its unsteady ability to transcend open divisions, and announced its resolve to overcome security challenges, especially the Boko Haram war.


All the president managed to say about the allegations of vendetta leveled against his government is that he bore no one ill will. While this would have been sufficient to answer questions about his altruism in calling the previous government to account over allegations of corrupt practices, it was certainly inadequate to explain his government’s puzzling and sometimes hesitant approach to the full-fledged rebellion in the Senate by lawmakers elected on the ruling party’s platform. He needed far more nuanced and analytical exposition on the matter, backed with a short excursion into historical antecedents, but he gave nothing of such.


On the equally deeper and complex issue of the country’s raison d’etre, especially the convoluted search for a national identity, the president offered the even blander solution of “unity of purpose’. In his view, the country’s inability to rise to world prominence is caused essentially by the failure of its people to achieve unified purpose. To resolve this problem he launched into a platitudinous admonition of his countrymen, from whom he expects exemplary behaviour. Said he: “You and I and all of us must appreciate that we all have our part to play if we want to bring change about. We must change our lawless habits, our attitude to public office and public trust. We must change our unruly behaviour in schools, hospitals, market places, motor parks, on the roads, in homes and offices. To bring about change, we must change ourselves by being law-abiding citizens. ” There were of course moments in his speech when the president seemed set to achieve some flourish and depth. The bland ending of the October 1 speech thwarted all that.


Overall, the speech was undone by its failure to recognise what the day called for. Even if he hated lengthy speeches, a prerogative no one can take from him, it was still important that he avail his long-suffering and sometimes confused countrymen his view on the salient, deeper and complex issues that trouble or even undermine Nigeria as a state. He talked at length on the manifestations of the problems that ail the country; when he instead needed to draw upon historical analysis to explain where the country is situated, why it has found it difficult to soar, and how it can be made to run competitively.


Except for his views on corruption, insecurity and discipline, there was nothing in his speech on economic blueprint or the much-needed new ethos that should form the bedrock of the country’s focus and purpose. In fact, the president enunciated a rather confusing and a little detached perspective on democracy, particularly partisan politics and the limits and possibilities of presidential powers. Not too long ago he had embraced troubling political anachronisms, whether as it concerned the value of his cabinet or the lack of breadth of his kitchen cabinet. And now he has incredibly zeroed in on the absence of unity of purpose as the reason for Nigeria’s troubles, when clearly, to nearly everyone, and especially analysts and leaders themselves, the problem is much more that of leadership failing than anything else.


It is understandable why President Buhari, a ranking member of the country’s leadership elite, is reluctant to indict that elite for undermining the nation’s peace and progress. But there is no running away from the fact that Nigeria’s underdevelopment is in large parts attributable to leadership failing than any other factor. If on October 1, the president was unable to provide his own unique perspective on the country’s woes, nor agree to leadership failing as an explanation, then the road will be much tougher and longer than anyone may presume. No country has been able to rise above the quality and competence of its iconic leaders. Nigeria will not be an exception. If President Buhari can’t persuade his countrymen that he understands the nation’s problems, he cannot also persuade them he has the magic wand. Without a magic wand, it is unlikely his remedies will go beyond addressing the superficial, let alone achieve anything more than the placebo effect.


President Buhari needs help. There is no question he is a more appropriate and zealous leader for these times than his predecessor, the undisciplined Dr Jonathan. But he must be made to understand that theory drives practice, and abstract comes before reality. Except he is helped to conceive or envision great things, it is impossible to engender great and anticipated realities with energy and passion.





Source link